[Open-graphics] Subversion commit policy

[Timothy Normand Miller]

Are you sure you mean Clause 7?  I'm looking at it, and that's just a
definition of a "binary distribution".

http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=Subversion+Commit+Policy

On 4/5/07, Simon <simon80 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Timothy Normand Miller <theosib at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not going to do anything further on it unless more people come to
> > some conclusion on it different from how they decided before.
>
> I was thinking about this lately, and I realized that I didn't
> articulate my actual concern about the license.  If the work is dual
> licensed under the GPL, then it should be ok for someone who is
> reusing the code to completely replace the dual license blurb with a
> generic GPL license blurb (leaving the copyright notice in, of
> course), whereas those two clauses seem to imply that that's not ok to
> do.  That's why I originally said that clause 7 should go to the
> start, and everything else should get moved out, because if someone
> relicenses the work under the GPL, they only really need to keep the
> definitions and the GPL blurb in.
>


-- 
Timothy Normand Miller
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
Open Graphics Project