[Open-graphics] Clock generation
James Richard Tyrer
tyrerj at acm.org
Sat Dec 1 20:57:13 EST 2007
James Richard Tyrer wrote:
> It appears that the solution to the jitter problem might be to change
> the way that we generate the clocks.
>
> Something like this could be used to generate the existing two clocks
> plus a third one to drive the pixel clock generators:
>
> http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cdcel937.pdf
>
> This is EEPROM (1K cycles) so it can't be used for the pixel clock
> generators.
>
> For the pixel clock generators, the maximum frequency required and
> output voltage required are going to be the main parameters to choose
> parts.
>
To add to this. If, we use a frequency synthesizer for the pixel
clocks, it might actually be less expensive since the PLL's phase
detector would operate at a much lower frequency.
The NXP (Phillips) 3xDAC has a maximum frequency of 330MHz as does the
SiI1178. If we are going to use a pixel clock that fast, there aren't
many dot clock generators that are that fast. 200 to 230MHz seems to be
the upper limit for most chips.
I found a Phillips part that we might want to look at:
http://www.nxp.com/pip/PCK12429_3.html
I'm not well today so someone else will have to look at it.
I also found an IDT chip but it is 5 volt.
If we are going to de-jitter, we should probably look at RF parts.
--
JRT
More information about the Open-graphics
mailing list