[Open-graphics] Re: Porting PCI
Timothy Normand Miller
theosib at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 13:13:28 EST 2007
Oops. I forgot some. Two other types of metacomments we need to port:
// synthesis attribute MAX_FANOUT of ad_oe is 1
// synthesis attribute equivalent_register_removal of stop_oe is "no"
On Dec 10, 2007 11:15 AM, Timothy Normand Miller <theosib at gmail.com> wrote:
> This one will require research, which I'll start on, but I'd like
> someone else to take responsibility for it.
>
> Aside from perhaps a bit of work on I/O buffers, here's the main issue
> we need to address for PCI. For the Xilinx version, we have these:
>
> //synthesis attribute keep_hierarchy of mux0 is yes
>
> This indicates that a module that we have instantiated with the name
> mux0 must not be optimized through. The reason we need this has been
> described elsewhere. What we need to find out is the equivalent way
> to do this for Lattice chips. I think we select Synplicity as the
> synthesizer for Lattice.
>
> I've posted this, but let's not count on it:
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.fpga/browse_thread/thread/f289e39a2621d3cf#f2a1b773d6292bf0
>
> --
> Timothy Normand Miller
> http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
> Open Graphics Project
>
--
Timothy Normand Miller
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
Open Graphics Project
More information about the Open-graphics
mailing list