[Open-graphics] Subversion check-in policy

[Timothy Normand Miller]

I agree that posting a comment about the nature of your commit is
important, because documentation is important.  Plus there's the
educational angle.

On 5/1/07, Josephblack <josephhenryblack at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29/04/07, Petter Urkedal <urkedal at nbi.dk> wrote:
> > On 2007-04-29, Josephblack wrote:
> snip (thanks to Timothy for writing it):
> > > http://wiki.duskglow.com/tiki-index.php?page=Subversion+Commit+Policy
> > > We could always benefit from reviewing it. More eyes and that <g>
> > > So.. suggestions welcome.
> >
> > Looks good to me, snip
>
> I like it. I do have a small query about this comment:
> If you yourself are committing the patch to subversion, then it is not
> necessary for you to sign your submission on the mailing list.
>
> For legal clarity, as long as it is not a minor patch, perhaps all
> patches should be posted?
> *all can see there was a change
> *new ones following can learn why it changed and improve their skills.
>
> I have been following the git list, and sometimes a comment about why
> a fix is needed has been very educational.
>
> jb
> _______________________________________________
> Open-graphics mailing list
> Open-graphics at duskglow.com
> http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
> List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
>


-- 
Timothy Normand Miller
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~millerti
Open Graphics Project